Demo

    Image Source: India tv
    Rajat Sharma, Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of India TV.

    Vishwajit Anand, nephew of Union Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai, was killed in a family dispute in Navagachia near Bhagalpur in Bihar. Vishwajit was shot by his real brother Jayajit Anand. His mother was injured while rescuing the brothers in a quarrel. In the morning, a quarrel started over the filling of water from the hand pump outside the house, a scuffle took place, then the two brothers took out the pistol. Jaijeet shot Vishwajit, Vishwajit also fired. Both brothers were injured. Vishwajit Anand died. Jaijit’s condition is still critical. The weapons used in firing were illegal. The case is related to the family of the Union Home Minister. So politics started on this. Congress and RJD raised the question of law and order. When Rabri Devi raised the issue in the Legislative Council, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar erupted. He once again launched personal attacks on Rabri Devi. Nitish said that this incident happened due to mutual quarrel. Nitish Kumar gave Rabri Devi for Lalu Yadav’s time. In the Bhagalpur incident, the government is trying to save itself by saying that this matter is of mutual quarrel. Therefore, it is not right to make it an issue of law and order. But the question is, where did the illegal weapons come from the two brothers? The second question when a person who fired the firing died, the other person is in the hospital, where did the weapons disappear? Why could the police not have recovered the weapon till now? Are weapons getting so easily in Bihar and after any incident, weapons disappear so easily? Is this not the failure of the police? The reality is that law and order in Bihar has deteriorated. The criminals have encouraged and that is why the opposition gets a chance to attack the government again and again. Nitish Kumar cannot escape by personal attacking Rabri Devi every time. The way he gets excited in the House, the kind of language he uses is also not good symptoms.

    Why did the Punjab government drive the farmers from the border?

    Thirteen months later, traffic started on Shambhu and Khanouri border of Punjab and Haryana. The Punjab Police abolished the dharna of the farmer organizations running since February, uprooted the tents, dug up the concrete bolders on the streets, removed the barricading. The question in everyone’s mind is that why did the Aam Aadmi Party government take sudden action against the farmers? Why did their tents uproot by deception? In fact, Bhagwant Mann was under pressure from the businessmen and industrialists of Punjab. Punjab industries were losing about 1500 crores every month due to the closure of the border. When Bhagwant Mann tried to convince the farmers, the farmer leaders gave a lot of reply. Clearly said that the picket will continue, they will not withdraw from the border. Bhagwant Mann was angry with the same day. Later, industrialists also complained to Kejriwal. Kejriwal and Bhagwant Mann felt that the issue between the center and the farmers has embraced the Punjab government. The borders were opened. The industrialists became happy but the double standards of the Aam Aadmi Party were also revealed. The Aam Aadmi Party which once used to give food to the farmers sitting on the Shambhu border, arranged for water and electricity for them, described the service of the farmers as their religion, the government of the same party got bulldozers on the farmers’ tents. This decision will be expensive to the Punjab government.

    Foreign invaders should not be glorified

    Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has said that Kasheda will not tolerate a new India in the glory of invaders like Aurangzeb and Salar Masood Ghazi. Yogi said in Bahraich that it is treason to glorify those who try to end Sanatan, to trample faith. The invaders who have committed atrocities in India are not acceptable to the people of new India. In UP, there is a dispute about the Neja fair to be held in memory of Salar Masood Ghazi nowadays. Neja fair was not allowed in Sambhal, but the biggest fair in memory of Salar Masood Ghazi is held in Bahraich. This fair is also being opposed. Yogi said that in 1034, Maharaja Suheldev killed Salar Masood Ghazi in Bahraich on the banks of the Chittaora lake. Salar Masood’s grave is also in Bahraich. Every year millions of people come to the tomb of Salar Masood. Yogi said that Maharaja Suheldev is the identity of Bahraich, Bahraich is named after Rishi Balak, there is no place for any invading, if someone should be discussed in Bahraich, then it should be of Maharaja Suheldev who should have a dusty dust to a foreign invader that no one has even dared to lift eyes towards India. The Vishwa Hindu Parishad has demanded the district administration not to allow the Bahraich fair. The council says that people are confused that their vow, their diseases are cured due to the miracle of Salar Masood Ghazi, but the truth is that the place where this dargah is built, there was Sun Temple, Surya Kund, in which bathing caused diseases. Feroz Shah Tughlaq broke the temple in the 12th century. Therefore, the Sun Temple should be established again in Bahraich. Yogi Adityanath is true that foreign invaders should not be glorified. The legacy of this country belongs to everyone. The culture of this country belongs to the whole society. Who tried to eradicate this legacy, tried to destroy culture, how can it be glorified? (Rajat Sharma)

    See: ‘Today’s talk with Rajat Sharma’ full episode of March 20, 2025

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezyzuy5iduy

    Latest india news

    Share.

    Leave A Reply