Harshit Rana was included in the playing subsidy in place of Shivam Dubey.
Concussion Substitute: The fourth match of the five -match T20 series between India and England was played in Pune. The match may be named by Team India by 15 runs, but one of their decisions has completely disputed this match. Team India used the ICC’s conversion rule in this match. Under which the Indian team fielded Harshit Rana as a substitute player in place of Shivam Dubey in the second innings. The decision after which the England team and their fans did not look happy. In such a situation, let us know what this conversion rule is.
Is the rule of concentration?
Many rules have been made by the ICC in the game of cricket. Which is followed by international matches. One of these rules is also a conversion rule. Under which, if a player gets hurt from the head to the neck between the match, then using this rule, the team can include the other player in the middle match itself. However, according to the terms of playing ICC T20 International, Section 1.2.7.3 states that the ICC match referee should accept the Like to Like Consumption Replacement request, if the substitute is a similar player, which is the remaining of the match. His team will not benefit much in the part.
At the same time, Team India did not use the Like to Like Consult Replacement against England. After which a debate broke out whether Harshit Rana was a suitable replacement for Shivam Dubey. The sub-division of this rule 1.2.7.4 and 1.2.7.5 also states that the match referee should consider that the playing 11 as a conversion should be the same player. It is not that the bowler should be included in the playing 11 instead of the batsman and batsman instead of a bowler and the team will benefit due to the conversion player in the remaining time of the match.
Is Shivam Dubey and Harshit Rana the same player?
If we take a look at the new controversy standing after India vs England fourth T20 match, the biggest question is whether Shivam Dubey and Harshit Rana are the same players. In such a situation, the answer is not clear. Shivam Dubey has played 34 T20 matches for Team India, but he has bowled in only 23 innings. At the same time, he has completed his 4 over quota only twice in these 23 innings. At the same time, Harshit Rana scored 4 overs against England in the fourth T20 match and took three important wickets. On the other hand, if Shivam Dubey had been on the field in the second innings, hardly captain Surya would have even bowled to him. Overall, the opposition of England captain and his team on this issue is correct.
Understand the whole matter from timeline
- Shivam Dubey included in playing 11
- Shivam Dubey descended to bat in the first innings of the match
- Shivam Dubey scored 53 runs off 34 balls in this match
- Shivam Dubey suffered a head injury in the last over of the innings
- Dubey did not land on the field in the second innings of the match
- After two overs of the second innings passed, Harshit Rana was told that he would join the playing 11 as a conversion substitute.
- Harshit Rana came to bowl in the 12th over of the innings
- Harshit Rana took 3 wickets for 33 runs in 4 overs
- England captain Jose Butler appeared disappointed with the whole matter at the match’s baw of the match and he protested
Also read
IND Vs ENG: Jose Butler, who was seen angry with the decision of Team India and umpire, said his heart after the match
Ind vs Eng: Captain Suryakumar Yadav did not look happy even after victory, told it very bad
Latest cricket news